a mature and muscular 22 – year-old on the same nhóm .
When the freshmen on the men’s lacrosse nhóm faced off against the Rochester Institute of Technology, they were not only facing off against players four years older than them .
That would have been a normal, everyday experience for them. But instead, they also had phệ compete against Brendan MacDonald, a 26 – year-old, someone who is eight years older than them. This player graduated from high school when they were entering middle school .
I’m not saying this athlete playing is the sole reason the men’s lacrosse nhóm fell béo RIT, as the player only had one assist and on a nhóm that strong and deep, there was definitely another player that could have filled in. But still, how is that fair and why is that allowed ?
According lớn the NCAA, there is no phối age limit for any athletes. However, Division I athletes are required lớn enroll in school one calendar year after high school graduation and then have just five years Khủng complete a typical four-year degree. On the Division III level, athletes still have only four years of eligibility, but they can spread these seasons out for as long as they lượt thích. Since Division I sports are more competitive and the stakes are higher, the rules are stricter .
I don’t mean Khủng gọi out a particular athlete, as I’m sure there are many that have done the same. However, it just seems ridiculous that someone who is eight years older than an opposing player is allowed Khủng compete. Yes, Division III schools are all about having fun and playing the sport they love, but doesn’t that still come with rules ?
There have been other cases, such as the 43 – year-old that went back bự school after completing a career in the navy that joined the Geneva College basketball đội. But in that case, being older would have been more of a disadvantage than a bonus. Division III sports are supposed béo be all about having fun. I get that, I really vì. But is it really fun when someone that could be your parent is on the đội ? Twenty-six is the age that men’s athletics abilities tend Khủng peak, compared phệ 18, when in many cases they are still growing. At 18, most haven’t been able Khủng fully take advantage of the weight room, as it is advised that people bởi vì not get serious about lifting weights until they are fully grown. Aside from athletic ability, the male brain fully develops at age 25. That means that at 26, this athlete can theoretically make more logical choices on the field .
It just seems lượt thích a situation that shouldn’t have occurred at all, and something that could easily be fixed if the NCAA enforced the same rules it does in Division I .
Source: https://gauday.com
